How does steinbeck portray George, hero or villian? Essay

Of Mice and Men is based on the major themes of hard reality, dreams, companionship and tragedy particularly germane(predicate) to 1930s America, following the depression and economic poverty it caused. Steinbeck portrays George as a flawed character who doesnt display archetypal do-or-die(a) qualities, however the reader empathizes with him. Steinbeck therefore ultimately presents him as a anti-hero at bottom the context of the narrative. At the nonplusning of the novel, Steinbeck portrays George as a flawed character. George and lennie travel to a ranch , indicating the risky lifestyle of men during 1930s.Before arriving at the ranch, George loss his temper with lennie morosely implying bad temper and unsociability, and possibly emphasising Georges villainous side. an new(prenominal) perspective may be the build up of Georges anger, payable to complications in weed. Steinbeck implies this using the word restless. The enraged language heightens Georges villainous attributes, combined with adverbs explodes and snapped, increasing the readers confusion around George although they empathize with his hardships faced by staying with Lennie til now, these hardships are questioned by his actions later in the novel.Georges relationship with lennie conveys his character as a anti-hero, however this doesnt highlight his lack of conventional chivalric attributes. Lennies portrayed as protective towards George nobody hurts George Lennie growled. Nonetheless, this juxtaposition intensifies the pedigree between the pair. Perhaps Steinbeck uses this to intrigue the reader about the kinetics of their relationship, heightening the human side of George and allowing the reader to empathize with George under the circumstances.Steinbeck describes George as having sharp strong features due to his work as a itinerant migrator worker during the US depression. However, the reader may begin to question if Steinbeck is using the adjectives to describe Georges physical appea rance, or his strong character. contempt this, Georges most heroic quality is his intense care for others, specifically Lennie, where the reader observes the complexities of their companionship. I never seen one guy subscribe so much trouble for another Steinbeck allows the reader to notice Georges kinder human characteristics.On the other hand, Steinbeck uses the adverbs morosely the negative language empathises Georges villainous side. Additionally, Steinbeck uses the verbs snapped and glared to present George as common and sharp. Combined with harshly and briskly the readers suspicious reaction towards George is increased, and some sense of heroism is lost. the loss is intensified towards the end of the novel. In contrast to George, Steinbeck describes lennie as patient. juxtaposing Lennies innocence with Georges frustration.Despite this George looks ashamedly , which contrasts against his temper heightens his human characteristics compared with lennie anguished face. ** How ever this confuses the reader about Georges emotion towards Lennies, making the reader question whether Georges a hero or villain. The agent of dreams is the most powerful symbol in the novel, representing the possibility of self-reliance and freedom. Steinbeck presents George as inventor of the dream, therefore his heroic attributes become visible. Steinbeck conveys George as essentially protecting other characters from the cruelties of the world.Additionally, Steinbeck portrays George as an inspirational welcoming character, as George allows glaze and crocks to become bemused by the beauty of the dream. However this heightens their desperation and loneliness but also the curse and reliance they have in George. Even though each character subconsciously knows the dreams a unrealistic goal, they are still amazed. George spoke reverently conveys his deep respects and awe towards the dream, almost as if it was sacred. This could connect to his surname Milton reference to paradises l ost a 1930s poem about the destruction of a perfect place.here, Steinbeck heightens his human attributes. perhaps another perspective could be that George allowed the character to dream falsely as he knew the dream wasnt achievable. in the context of 1930s economic situation, maybe he knew theyd never do her and he agreed as Lennie usta like to hear about it. on the other hand, the dream may have been created for Georges benefit and selfishness. Therefore, through Georges dream Steinbeck highlights both heroic and potentially villainous attributes of his character.In the last scene, George murders lennie not through an evil intention but a pity killing. Steinbeck creates a paradox as George intends to kill lennie however George portrays being cruel to be kind. Steinbecks video display of Georges internal conflict is finally resolved. The reader observes that the Curley will punish lennie brutally and slowly shoot for his gumption. Therefore the reader empathises with George, as h e makes a conflicted decision between two actions. In contrast to George, Steinbeck portrays Curley as an archetypal villain. Curley is described as terrier.the malicious language elevates his villainous traits above Georges. combined with the adverbs lashed and harsh the readers negative reactions towards Curley heighten, as theyre unable to trust Curley, instead they feel a sense of wondrous and tension when hes around. therefore, when comparing George and Curley, George villainous qualities decrease and his heroic actions become more visible. Despite Georges complaints about lennie, he feels a brotherly connection with Lennie because Lennie provides an escape form loneliness of a migrant workers who are the loneliest guys in the world.However, an alternative perspective that heighten George heroism, is that perhaps George killed lennie, as he gain Lennie was a danger to society. Overall, the reader witnesses the depth of the sacrifice George made, even though it shattered is o wn dreams, strengthen the readers empathy towards George. Despite this the reader is unable to forgive Georges actions. This concludes Steinbeck as portraying George as a conflicting character, an anti-hero.